"Live churches" versus "dead" churches

In a couple of conversations recently, the conversation of "dead" churches versus "live" churches has come up.

What is a "live" church?

What is a "dead" church?

Some would share that a live church is one that is full of spirited emotion -- a place where people clap their hands and pat their feet.

Some would further state that a live church is one where the music is always upbeat and the preacher's voice swells to thunderous capacity.

Still others may believe that a live church is one that has been around for at least one hundred years.

I found an excellent description of a "live" church the other day. I am sure you will find it as challenging as I have.

"Live churches always have parking problems; dead churches don't.

Live churches are always changing their methods; dead ones don't have to.

Live churches have lots of noisy kids; dead churches are quiet.

Live churches' expenses always exceed their income; dead churches take in more than they ever dream of spending.

Live churches are constantly improving and planning for the future; dead churches worship in the past.

Live churches grow so fast they forget people's names; in dead churches, you've known everybody's name for years.

Live churches move out on faith; dead churches operate totally by sight.

Live churches support missions heavily; dead churches keep it all home.

Live churches are filled with tithers; dead churches are filled with tippers.

Live churches dream great dreams for God; dead churches hold the line.

Live churches have the fresh wind of love blowing; dead churches are stale with bickering.

Live churches do not have "Can't" in their vocabulary; dead churches have nothing but.

Live churches evangelize! Dead church fossilize."

Father, may we be a "live" church today! Grant it Lord, we pray, Amen.